I want to point out that a lot of what makes this aspect better in FL Studio is FL's popularity, the different types of technical difficulties you might come upon, and tricks you might find interesting have likely already been experienced and thoroughly discussed online because so many people use FL. However FL comes with a nice array of pre-loaded plugins like Gross-Beat, that are quite powerful. I don't want to say that LMMS isn't capable of accommodating these plugins because I am not super computer literate and it is possible that there are ways to make it work. The VST and Plugin Support is probably one of the biggest advantages to FL Studio I noticed immediately. Visually FL Studio is much prettier than LMMS, LMMS has a very stripped back retro-vibe while FL Studio has a very hi-tech look with lots of colors and graphics. Before I get into this I want to point out how impressed I've become with LMMS as a free software in comparison to the 200-300 dollar competitors Stay Tuned.I've been using LMMS for about 2 years and recently decided to try a paid DAW, specifically FL Studio, I wanted to talk a little bit about the differences I've noticed and give some insight to those of you who may be using LMMS as your DAW of choice, especially if it is your first one. Or if you’ve had enough words for now, you can check out the video below. If you’d like to check out the article, you can find it here. I spent a week wrapping my head around LMMS – Linux Multi Media Studio, which is music production software that is open source and available for free (on all OSes by the way), before I attempted to make a track from start to finish. I recently published an article on Purism’s site, the 1st video in a three-part series – PureOS for Creatives. While I don’t quite have the answer yet – I will have at least an idea shortly – as I am currently testing out laptops from two PC manufacturers who ship laptops and desktops with their own Linux distros: System 76 and Purism – to see if that task could be achieved. So I set out on a mission to discover the answer, could I make the transition to Linux on Hardware endorsed by the FSF (Free Software Foundation) and give up the Pro Tools, FL Studios, and Abletons’ for good? The Open Source LMMS (Linux MultiMedia Studio) has 75% of the features of commerical software – for free While discussing how their devices – the Librem line of products – can deliver a quality experience with Top-Notch hardware running Linux without compromising user rights The question most important to me that rose to mind was,” What type of compromise would someone who usually depends on proprietary software have to make in the name of User Rights, privacy and security? I have been doing a bit of grassroots R&D with a company called Purism, and their CEO Todd Weaver and CTO Kyle Rankin. But for now I want to start off on a topic a bit more digestible to our reader base: Content Creation on Linux using Open Source software. While this is a deep rabbit hole that will take some time to cover, most likely over the span of several articles – and we most certainly will address the elephant in the room – User Privacy and Security is at stake. As you know, there has been quite a bit of hoopla in the press about how Big Tech companies like Amazon, Apple, Facebook, and Google earn their money off of horded user data to some degree or another. For the majority of 2020, we have been doing a lot of research at Labfreq – in regards to Big Data, user data flow, and the overall mass surveillance and monetization of our activities, interests, and browsing habits.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |